Skip to content
Read our 2025 Mid-Year Update
  • About
  • Our Approach
  • Companies
  • Team
    • Team
    • K1 Careers
    • Portfolio Careers
  • Media
  • Contact K1
Follow us on LinkedIn
Insights April 10, 2020

How Agile Teams Can Master the Art of Saying NO

Legendary investor Warren Buffet has said that the core habit that separates successful people from very successful people, is that the latter say no to almost everything. Evidently, very successful agile marketing teams are borrowing from Mr. Buffet's playbook, because compared to their counterparts, they're supremely talented in the art of saying no.
How Agile Teams Can Master the Art of Saying NO

This post was originally published by Yoav Boaz at Clarizen.

Legendary investor Warren Buffet has said that the core habit that separates successful people from very successful people, is that the latter say no to almost everything. Evidently, very successful agile marketing teams are borrowing from Mr. Buffet’s playbook, because compared to their counterparts, they’re supremely talented in the art of saying no.

What makes this trait even more impressive, is that conventional marketing teams — including very successful ones — have typically been wired to say yes to virtually all requests and changes. In fact, marketing’s assent is so utterly assumed in some organizations, that requests aren’t really requests. They’re basically orders, albeit with a cursory “would you mind?” or “can you help with this?” thrown in for esthetic purposes.

Yet when conventional project teams adopt an agile paradigm, one of the first things they must do is learn how to say no. This isn’t because they want to. It’s because agile is built on three integrated pillars:

1. Prioritizing work and focusing on what matters most vs. what matters least.

2. Ushering prioritized work through a standardized workflow (e.g. create, review 1, review 2, launch ready, to launch, complete).

3. Limiting the number of tasks in each phase of the workflow.

Agile teams that cannot say no undermine this integration — and open the door to chaos and failure. Nobody knows which tasks are a priority anymore, because everything is a priority. Workflows stop flowing as tasks crash into each other. And team members suffer an overwhelming, endless workload burden that leads to disengagement and burnout, along with quality issues, missed deadlines, unhappy customers, and sub-par results.

So, how can agile teams learn to say no, but without triggering endless conflict, or being unfairly perceived as chronically disagreeable and blatantly unhelpful? Frankly, it’s not easy. But it can (and must) be done. Here are some practical tips to keep in mind:

1. Educate Outsiders

Many conventional teams and customers outside of the agile world think that agile is basically conventional project management, but with some added flexibility and nimbleness. But when their requests are rejected instead of accepted, they get frustrated — and sometimes outraged. The best way to avoid this turbulence is for agile teams to educate outsiders on how agile works, and how it doesn’t. This awareness goes a long way to clarifying expectations, and turning potential adversaries into supportive allies.

2. Establish Visibility

Even with an awareness of how agile works and how it doesn’t, some external teams and customers may still balk at the idea of their “urgent request” being dumped into a backlog; especially if in the past this hasn’t been an issue. To address this key challenge, agile teams should use a simple and streamlined task management tool like Clarizen Go that lets executives and the PMO access an updated high-level overview of tasks in the workflow, so they can clearly see what is really going on — and do their part to keep workflows flowing.

3. Enforce Work-in-Progress Limits

Agile teams that use Kanban or Scrumban (Kanban + Scrum) methodology should focus on — or make that be obsessed about — enforcing realistic work-in-progress (WIP) limits for each phase of the workflow. For example, if teams determine the number of tasks that can simultaneously exist in the “review” phase is 10, then under no circumstances should an 11th task be added until a spot opens up. Admittedly, enforcing WIP limits can be much easier said than done. But agile teams that give ground on this front will have an extraordinarily difficult time reclaiming it back later on.

4. Break Down Requests to (Possibly) Turn No’s into Yes’s

Agile teams should reach into their diplomatic toolkit and see if there is a way to break down requests into something smaller, faster, and more viable. While there is no guarantee that a counter-offer like this will be accepted, it’s worth the effort.

5. Install a Scrum Master 

Last but certainly not least, agile teams should install Scrum Master (or any other suitably authorized individual) who acts as a gatekeeper to vet requests before they’re added to the backlog. These essential people shield team members from burdens, noise and distractions, while they educate customers and manage expectations.

The Bottom Line

The shift from conventional project management to agile can be difficult; not just for agile teams themselves, but also — and sometimes especially — for external teams and customers that want to do things “they way that they’ve always been done”. Well, there’s no turning back the clock. There’s only forging ahead, and agile teams that master the art of saying NO put themselves on track for long-term success.

Source: https://www.clarizen.com/how-agile-teams-can-master-the-art-of-saying-no/



About the Author
Yoav Boaz










More resources:

RFPIO: Elevate the RFP Process in Your Asset Management Organization
Clarizen: The 10 Unexpected Joys of Virtual Happy Hour
IRONSCALES: The Scattered Perimeter: A New Norm
Emburse: Virtualizing Financial Operations to Adapt to Increased Work from Home Requirements
Jobvite: How to Thrive at Home – Whether You’re Working or Simply Living



Share This Post

Recent News

View All
Award

K1 Named Top Private Equity Firm of 2025 by GrowthCap

August 20, 2025

K1 Named to Inc.’s Top Founder-Friendly Investors in 2025

November 15, 2025
Award

30 K1 Portfolio Companies Make the 2025 Inc. 5000 List

August 13, 2025
View All
Award

K1 Named Top Private Equity Firm of 2025 by GrowthCap

August 20, 2025

K1 Named to Inc.’s Top Founder-Friendly Investors in 2025

November 15, 2025
Award

30 K1 Portfolio Companies Make the 2025 Inc. 5000 List

August 13, 2025
About
  • About Us
  • Contact K1
Our Approach
  • Our Approach
Media
  • Press Releases
  • Awards & Appearances
Companies
  • Our Companies
Team
  • Team
  • K1 Careers
  • Portfolio Careers
  • Follow us on LinkedIn

Certain statements about K1 Investment Management LLC (“K1”) made by portfolio company executives herein are intended to illustrate K1's business relationship with such persons, including with respect to K1's facilities as a business partner, rather than K1's capabilities or expertise with respect to investment advisory services. Portfolio company executives were not compensated in connection with their participation, although they generally receive compensation and investment opportunities in connection with their portfolio company roles, and in certain cases are also owners of portfolio company securities and/or investors in K1-sponsored vehicles. Such compensation and investments subject participants to potential conflicts of interest in making the statements herein. For K1, “carbon neutral” means that any greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions derived from a defined scope of K1’s activities are balanced by an equivalent amount removed, including through our purchase of carbon credits. In this report, our “carbon neutral” status is based on our GHG emissions footprint calculated in accordance with the GHG Protocol as of December 31st, 2023 (comprising Scope 2 Electricity and Gas usage and certain Scope 3 categories: Business Travel and Employee Commuting), amounting to an estimated 3,497 metric tons CO2e. K1 then purchased and applied carbon credits in 2024, amounting to an estimated 6,994 metric tons of CO2e. We engaged a third party to assist with the calculation of K1’s estimated GHG emissions for 2023, but we did not obtain independent, third-party verification of our “carbon neutral” status. To address our 2023 emissions, we contributed to the Conservación y Captura de Carbono / Conservation and Carbon Capture (CO2LTZINGO) reforestation carbon removal project in Coltzingo, Mexico (CAR 1464). This project was certified by the Climate Action Reserve (CAR), using the Protocolo Forestal para México (PFM) Versión 1.5 / Mexico Forest Protocol Version 1.5 and the Guía de Cuantificación de Acervos de Carbono y Monitoreo del Proyecto Versión 1.5 / Project Monitoring and Carbon Stock Quantification Guidance Version 1.5 with a validation date of January 15th, 2019.

© 2025, K1 Investment Management

Legal Disclaimer Privacy Policy
BACK TO TOP